National Association of Health and Educational Facilities Finance Authorities
  • Home
  • About
    • Board of Directors
    • Committee Members
  • Events & Conferences
    • Spring 2025 Conference Agenda
    • 2025 Sponsor Program
  • Publications
    • Membership / Sponsors >
      • Current Members
      • 2025 SPONSOR DIRECTORY
  • Advocacy
  • Contact
  • Members Only
    • NAHEFFA Member-only Info
    • Conference Materials
    • Conference Material (2016-2019)
  • NAHEFFA Webinars
  • New Page
  • New Page

Trump versus Clinton Infrastructure Plan

11/18/2016

0 Comments

 
As we discussed on the webinar, we need to take President-elect Trump’s and his advisers’ pronouncements both seriously and literally.

In that regard, two of his major economic advisers, who could very well end up in high places in the Administration, wrote this paper on infrastructure. It's worth your reading as finance professionals. They propose heavy tax credit incentives to obtain massive private investment paid for by the repatriation of corporate profits now being held abroad. It contains somewhat favorable references to conventional tax exempt financing albeit with some criticisms with respect to the purported inefficiencies of government financed construction (not really relevant to nonprofit financing) and even the need to follow a shorter construction schedule as required by the tax laws. It also states that there are limitations to muni bonds where revenue flows from the project are weak. Presumably that means that the tax credits will be used  to over subsidize private investment.

In any case, one of muni community’s tasks will be to integrate this type of proposal with the maintenance of the well-functioning conventional financing structure.
0 Comments

The First Reaction

11/9/2016

0 Comments

 
Wow. One hardly knows what to say and certainly virtually everybody in Washington needs to take an enormous dose of humility, particularly in our prognostications.

There will be time for lots of commentary and evaluation—join us on the November 16 webinar!! - but here are at least a few thoughts:

In terms of what happened yesterday, it appears that Mr. Trump –  and now that he is President-elect, a much more respectful tone is required – will receive fewer votes than Sen. McCain or Gov. Romney did when they lost. The Democrats did not get out the votes. African-American, Latino and younger voters failed to show up at the polls in sufficient numbers Tuesday to propel Clinton into the White House.  While she won the key demographic groups her campaign targeted, she underperformed President Obama across the board, even among women.
Trump mobilized enormous margins among rural and exurban voters, and crushing advantages among blue-collar whites. In several cases, he prevented Clinton from making as many gains among college-educated white voters as seemed possible. The Republican voters came back to the roost. That allowed Trump to overcome Clinton’s strong performance among minority voters and college-educated white women. Trump’s victory also upended long-standing political wisdom favoring candidates who raise more money and outspend their rivals. Trump was outraised and outspent by Clinton.

But however you feel about all this, you still have authorities to run. So what does  this mean for us? My initial take is whether or not Ryan survives as Speaker, the Republican control of the government will allow tax reform to move ahead. Both Mr. Trump's and Mr. Ryan's speeches last night emphasized that. Nobody's thinking that House Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady's position is threatened, and he's been saying over and over that he is operating under the assumption that a House vote on tax reform bill in 2017 will be premised on the reforms that the GOP released in June. You recall that that blueprint probably is best interpreted to have eliminated tax-exempt bonds. Mr. Trump remolded his original tax plan to move toward House Republicans. His plan for massive infrastructure investments seems to be hinged on tax credits for private investment. Whether that would be in lieu of traditional municipal financing or not is unknown. Of course, the  same committees that work on this issue would have to figure out what they're going to do about Obama care which they now own whether they like it or not.

Tomorrow, I meet with the Public Finance Network of state and local government groups and issuers and part of the agenda certainly will be how to influence the transition planning as well as the new key administration officials, as they become known. There also is the very significant area of Mr. Trump’s stated commitment to unwind major portions of the Dodd Frank Act. What that would mean for the provisions that affect munis, such as the MA rule and some of the restrictions on investments by banks and mutual funds, also is unknown.
​
So that's just a couple thoughts. There will be much, much more, and I hope you will join us on the November 16 webinar with my colleagues from ML Strategies who will attempt to sort this out with a bit more time to reflect.
0 Comments

Bond Buyer: Trump's Tax, Infrastructure Plan Jeopardize Tax Exemption for Munis

11/9/2016

0 Comments

 
Trump's Tax, Infrastructure Plan Jeopardize Tax Exemption for Munis
By Evan Fallor and Jack Casey and Lynn Hume
November 9, 2016

Both Donald Trump and House Republicans are pushing for tax reform plans that would lower individual and corporate tax rates and broaden the tax base, repealing or restricting tax deductions and exemptions.

RELATED

Muni Pros Bemoan Lack of Detail in Tax Plans for Infrastructure, Muni Exemption
Tax Credits Drive Trump's $1 Trillion Infrastructure Plan

WASHINGTON -- Donald Trump's presidency and the Republican-controlled Congress set the stage for historic tax reform and increased spending on infrastructure next year, which has the potential to jeopardize the tax exemption for municipal bonds, according to market participants.

Both Trump and House Republicans are pushing for tax reform plans that would lower individual and corporate tax rates and broaden the tax base, repealing or restricting tax deductions and exemptions.

"The win, because it means that the GOP will control the executive office and both houses of Congress, almost surely means the next Congress will act on major tax legislation focused on cutting rates," said Frank Shafroth, director of the Center for State and Local Government Leadership at George Mason University. "I would guess it will be the most significant, early bill signed into law by the new president."

"They're going to strike while the iron is hot," agreed Chuck Samuels, a partner at Mintz Levin.

Read More
0 Comments

    Author

    Charles A. Samuels
    Charles is a Member in the Washington D.C. office of Mintz Levin. He also serves as Washington Advocate to NAHEFFA.

    Archives

    December 2019
    October 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

© 2014 NAHEFFA. All Rights Reserved. 6009 West Highland Drive, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814  | [email protected]

Contact      About